Lipschtick and Pigs (Mary Lyon)
(World News Trust) -- Amazing what a difference a week makes.
Something has changed since Sarah Palin burst into the Republican Convention and started living it up by the stiletto. It still stings to look back over her mean-spirited, scornful, barb-laden speech. Whoever once said sticks and stones might hurt but names would not, has obviously never met the new Republican Annie Oakley wannabe. But it’s not just the nastiness anymore. Now it’s the wall-to-wall lies. Evidently she hasn’t yet bothered to visit the now-fabled “Straight Talk Express.”
I’ve noticed an interesting new yeast beginning to leaven the Sarah Palin story. Her acid tongue has pierced through a wall that seemed unassailable for years. The near-adoration of her by a ridiculously fawning media a few days ago now has some strings attached. For a nauseatingly long time, Republicans in general and the Bush administration in particular have enjoyed a singular freedom from vetting by the media. The most we’ve ever had when one of these people bore false witness was a lipstick-on-pig vocabulary of delicate wordings and phrasings such as “misleading,” “misstating,” “misspeaking,” “misrepresenting,” “stretching the truth,” “exaggerating,” “prevaricating,” and other verbal tidy-wipes.
Sarah Palin’s statements have apparently pushed this tolerance threshold just a bit too far. Seems someone has finally noticed -- and doesn’t mind saying so -- that the lady has trouble telling the truth. For the first time, I’ve actually heard some mainstream media people using that other “L-word” -- lie -- in all its derivations, when discussing her. That attests to the power of the blogosphere that decided not to wait for the mainstreamers to fact-check her claims. I guess their due diligence dug up so much pay dirt so quickly that the conventional media couldn’t afford to remain so willfully blind or deferentially on their knees any longer. Previously, there never would have been heard a discouraging word -- after all, we are talking about a Republican here.
I think it might be a case of “it’s the magnitude, stupid.” It would be one thing if the issue were a single boo-boo, or one teeny tiny tall tale that gets a nice laugh and then fades. But with Palin, it keeps coming and coming and coming, over and over and over again. Not just one inadvertent omission or exaggeration. Multiple statements she made in her speech, and repeated on campaign stops, have not passed the smell test. At such a high level of regularity, it shouldn’t be surprising that somebody somewhere started to notice. That heightened awareness has bloomed from such blogs as Talking Points Memo, DailyKos, and ThinkProgress to Newsweek, the Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal, ABC News, MSNBC, NBC’s Nightly News, CBS, the Washington Post, even Chris Wallace on Fox Noise, and CNN’s Wolf Blitzer wondering aloud “is she telling the whole truth?” We’re finally seeing the media at least attempting to be completely impartial and start questioning again, rather than dutifully funneling whatever any GOP celebrity said, directly from tongue to TV screen and news print without regard to whether that tongue might be forked.
Now there’s a growing awareness of the need to correct both Palin’s and John McCain’s statements repeatedly, because these two have provided so much material to work with. In her case, it’s about the Bridge to Nowhere, earmarks, pork-barrel spending, the executive jet that may or may not have been sold on EBAY (maybe for a profit and maybe not), how innocent and occasional was her questioning of the employment of her ex-brother-in-l aw, and what she personally pocketed in travel expenses while living at home. For McCain, there’s the whole side show regarding who said “lipstick on a pig” about what or whom, complete with multiple video clips of his own (pardon the pun) liberal use of that phrase.
Is it time, yet, to declare that the McCain/Palin bloom fading from the rose? Has the blanket free pass finally been revoked? Richard Wolffe went so far on MSNBC’s “Countdown” to say that the McCain/Palin campaign may well have “jumped the pig.” I’ve watched over several days as the coverage of the campaign has changed ever so slightly in timbre. It looks as though they’re not just swallowing Republican talking points whole, or mindlessly anymore. As much time seems to be spent, now, dissecting the content of a stump speech or a campaign commercial to examine what’s misleading or flat-out false, misquoted, or taken out of context. Nobody ever seemed that interested in such meticulous autopsies before. Perhaps the news media has decided, at least partially, that lapdog time is old news, and watchdog time is back on the clock.
Which brings us to the lip service about “lipstick.” Is “lipstick” the exclusive property of the GOP? Both Sarah Palin and John McCain would have you believe it is. Why else would McCain relish using the “lipstick on a pig” phrase about Hillary Clinton’s health care plan during the primaries, and peppering his public comments with it on any number of occasions, only to take great umbrage when Barack Obama uses the same phrase to describe McCain’s policies?
Palin attempted to assert claims of exclusive ownership of the word “lipstick” in her convention speech. Sarah, dear, let me help you here at the cosmetics counter. You do not own that word. You never did. No one woman unilaterally does. Nor do Rudy Giuliani, Kiss, or RuPaul. Tammy Faye Bakker certainly didn’t -- and she might actually have had a reasonable claim. Connie Francis didn’t, even while singing “Lipstick on your collar told a tale on you” in 1959. Nor did Margaux Hemingway in the film “Lipstick” ten years later, or more recently Alesha Dixon in her “Lipstick” video, or Brooke Shields on TV’s “Lipstick Jungle.” Max Factor doesn’t even own that word. No one ever issued Palin a trademark for it.
What’s next? Might we soon see Palin suing for copyright violation if Obama or another Democrat uses the word “lipstick” in a sentence from here until Election Day? And if so, shouldn’t it be John McCain who might take such legal action? After all, the video clip of Obama using the words “lipstick” and “pig” in the same sentence featured him mentioning only one name: McCain’s. Not Palin’s. Maybe we’re getting a little touchy?
There’s one other point to make here. At the convention, Palin herself declared that she was ready for a good fight. She proved that she can throw a punch, and she seems eager to keep doing so. Anybody who struts around a stage boldly likening herself to a “pitbull in lipstick” is spoiling for some sort of dust-up, or at least talking like it. Those are fightin’ words. If you adopt such a belligerent posture, you lose your right to object when and if some of the punches coming at you start landing a little too hard. For the McCain/Palin campaign to start whining and yelling “No Fair!” now, when they were the ones who started waving their lipstick at America is tantamount to smearing that lipstick directly into the Looking Glass. Besides, it’s the P.O.W. griping on behalf of a running mate who’s presently M.I.A., which makes him look small and rather pathetic. She’s more than capable of defending herself. After all, this lady painted her
own face with war paint, in the first place. Nobody forced her hand.
What’s encouraging is that the mainstream media is now no longer pulling its own punches. It’s MORE than fair to ask questions, and challenge phony and off-base claims, especially when you have a record AND the video tape to underscore the validity of that challenge. Let the full media vetting surge ahead. As voters we have the absolute right to know whether McCain and Palin, who would govern our land and our lives, are lying and fudging the facts when they make their case for our support. It’s long past time when only Democrats should be subject to a political proctoscope while Republicans get a mere skin-deep overview. It’s good, finally, to see that press people aren’t willing to take much at face value from either party any longer -- with or without lipstick.
Mary Lyon is a veteran broadcaster and five-time Golden Mike Award winner, who has anchored, reported, and written for the Associated Press Radio Network, NBC Radio "The Source," and many Los Angeles-area stations including KRTH-FM/AM, KLOS-FM, KFWB-AM, and KTLA-TV, and occasional media analyst for ABC Radio News. She began her career as a liberal activist with the Student Coalition for Humphrey/Muskie in 1968, and helped spearhead a regional campaign, The Power 18," to win the right to vote for 18-year-olds. She remains an advocate for liberal causes, responsibility and accountability in media, environmental education and support of the arts for children, and green living. In addition to World News Trust, Mary writes for Huffington Post, OpEdNews, Democrats.us, WeDemocrats.org's "We! The People" webzine. Mary is also a parenting expert, having written and llustrated the book "The Frazzled Working Woman's Practical Guide to Motherhood.
- CreatedThursday, September 11, 2008
- Last modifiedWednesday, November 06, 2013
World Desk Activities
medicalxpress.com/news/2024-03-optimism-contribute…
Study suggests maintaining optimism contributes to better mobility in women as they grow older
A large team of social scientists, psychologists and geriatric specialists affiliated with a host of institutions across the U.S. reports that women who remain optimistic…
medicalxpress.com/news/2024-03-association-histori…
New study shows association of historical housing discrimination and shortfalls in colon cancer treatment
A nationwide study of 196 cities shows that housing discrimination from 90 years ago still casts a historical shadow of inequities in colon cancer care…
medicalxpress.com/news/2024-03-biomarker-numerous-…
Possible new biomarker for better detection of numerous inflammatory diseases
Tryptophan is an essential amino acid, which means that it cannot be produced by the body but must be included as part of our diet.…
techxplore.com/news/2024-03-highlights-global-stra…
techxplore.com/news/2024-03-amazon-billion-centers…
techxplore.com/news/2024-03-responsible-ai-tools-b…
techxplore.com/news/2024-03-white-house-policies-f…
phys.org/news/2024-03-perceptions-good-schools-hea…
Perceptions of 'good' schools are heavily dependent on the preparation of the students entering them, study finds
Are schools that feature strong test scores highly effective, or do they mostly enroll students who are already well-prepared for success? A study co-authored by…
Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
- EFF Asks Oregon Supreme Court Not to Limit Fourth Amendment Rights Based on Terms of Service March 27, 2024
- Meta Oversight Board’s Latest Policy Opinion a Step in the Right Direction March 26, 2024
- Speaking Freely: Robert Ssempala March 26, 2024
- Podcast Episode: About Face (Recognition) March 26, 2024
The Intercept
- Pro-Israel Advocates Are Weaponizing “Safety” on College Campuses March 28, 2024
- Kamala Harris Touts Secret Service Program Encouraging High School Spying March 28, 2024
- Pentagon Ignores Law Calling for Report on How It Trained So Many African Coup Leaders March 28, 2024
- Anti-Abortion Doctors Struggle to Explain Mifepristone Harms Before Supreme Court March 27, 2024
VTDigger
- PHOTOS: Northeast Kingdom student wins Vermont spelling bee with ‘utilitarian’ March 28, 2024
- Final Reading: Phil Scott’s education secretary pick draws opposition March 28, 2024
- State resolves troopers’ reckless endangerment charges with pretrial diversion March 28, 2024
- Senate advances tax on streaming services to bolster public media March 28, 2024
Mountain Times -- Central Vermont
- Hartland School Board explains budget before vote, April 2 March 28, 2024
- The Mountain Times – Volume 51, Number 13 – March 27 – April 2, 2024 March 27, 2024
- Weekly Horoscope — March 27 – April 2, 2024 March 27, 2024
- Easter flowers: what’s in your bouquet? March 27, 2024