The core argument of last week’s post centered on the possibility of building a better future by deliberate planning, and many of the comments and critiques took issue with my suggestion that this is not only impossible but counterproductive. While most of these latter noted that they were participants in the Transition Town movement, the ideas they expressed in that context are anything but unique to that movement; rather, it expresses a consensus that extends through most of the peak oil scene, and indeed, most of contemporary society. Despite its popularity, though, this confidence in our ability to plan the future seems woefully misplaced to me, and the reasons that have forced me to dissent from the consensus may be worth discussing here.
Trying to plan a way out of the crisis of industrial society is an old habit. Back in the 1970s, when the challenge posed by the limits to growth was first showing up on the radar screens of our collective discourse, a great deal of discussion centered on how global planning could back humanity away from the brink; since then, similar plans on various scales -- local, regional, national, global -- have appeared at regular intervals. The durable Lester Brown, to name only one of these would-be planners, released the original version of his Plan B in 2003; he’s now on version 3.0, and further versions will no doubt be forthcoming in due time.
A double helping of irony surrounds all this flurry of planning. If the crisis we face could be met by making plans, we’d have little to worry about; the difficulty is that making plans is the easy part. Go digging in the archives of most American municipalities and you’ll find an energy plan drafted and adopted, after extensive citizen input, in the 1970s, calling for exactly the changes that would have made matters today much less dire: conservation standards, public transit projects, zoning changes to reduce the need for cars, and so on. You’ll have to brush a quarter inch of dust off the plan to read it, though, since nobody has looked at it since the Reagan years, and not one of its recommendations was still functioning when the housing boom began in the early 1990s. A certain skepticism toward another round of plans may thus be in order.
Latest Stories
Electronic Frontier Foundation
-
Speaking Freely: Obioma Okonkwo
April 23, 2024
-
Screen Printing 101: EFF's Spring Speakeasy at Babylon Burning
April 23, 2024
-
Podcast Episode: Right to Repair Catches the Car
April 23, 2024
-
U.S. Senate and Biden Administration Shamefully Renew and Expand FISA Section 702, Ushering in a Two Year Expansion of Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance
April 22, 2024
The Intercept
VTDigger
-
Jean Waltz: To guarantee equitable education in Vermont, we must protect Act 127
April 24, 2024
-
Joanna Lidback: Banning neonicotinoids will put our farms and nature out of balance
April 24, 2024
-
Citing devastation in Gaza, Sanders and Welch oppose aid package for Ukraine and Israel
April 24, 2024
-
Final Reading: Vermont lawmakers respond to ‘ghost guns’ case addition to SCOTUS docket
April 23, 2024
Mountain Times -- Central Vermont
-
The Mountain Times – Volume 51, Number 16 – April 17-23, 2024
April 17, 2024
-
Weekly Horoscope: April 17-23, 2024
April 17, 2024
-
Bookstock cancels summer event after 14 years
April 17, 2024
-
Crêpe breakfast tradition at sport hill
April 17, 2024